OurMichiganParks.org

The Grand Rapids Press has published these opinions about the proposed Michigan State Parks Recreation Passport funding proposal.

From Howard Meyerson, Grand Rapids Press:

I love it when a good idea gains traction — especially when it is simple and efficient. Better still when it can help protect natural places. All the better when it can save us money.

That’s what’s happening in Lansing with a bill to fund state parks, state forest recreation and local parks.

State parks were set aside to provide a public land legacy for future generations. We might use them, but with our support, they will be there for the next generation.

Those who care not, pay not. It doesn’t get much simpler.

Read the entire Meyerson column

From the Grand Rapids Press:

Michigan’s state parks and recreation areas are among its prime attractions. But they are falling into disrepair because they lack a stable and sustainable source of funding. A proposal to eliminate park entrance fees in favor of a $10 surcharge on annual vehicle registration could lure more visitors to the facilities and raise more money for their upkeep. It’s a revenue stream that could be a lifesaver for state parks.

Michigan’s parks draw millions of tourists to the state who fuel the economy by patronizing local shops, restaurants and businesses. A stable source of funds to help better maintain our state parks system is a good investment.

Read the entire editorial

From Howard Meyerson, Outdoors Writer for the Grand Rapids Press (March 14, 2008):

Sitting still doesn’t sit well with the members of the Citizens Advisory Committee for State Parks. And so they don’t. You gotta love ‘em.

They were convened by the legislature to advise it on long-range state park funding matters. The committee developed a smart, forward-thinking proposal last November that is now languishing.

It does away with the $24 annual and $6 daily entry fees at 98 state parks, as well as 1,007 state-run boating access sites. It replaces the higher fees with a $9 fee added to license plate renewals for everyone. Those who do not want to support parks can opt-out and get their $9 back.

Best of all, it would provide funding for state parks, local parks and state forest recreation programs — all which need it badly.

Their very viable proposal is one the legislature should take seriously. It belongs in a portfolio of long-range funding options for the DNR.

You can read the entire article on-line.